Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Luke McNamara's avatar

Arguments Missing in the Individual’s Analysis

1. Bitcoin as a Strategic Reserve Asset

   •   The negative ROIC, ROA, and ROE metrics overlook the fact that MicroStrategy functions less as a traditional software company and more as a Bitcoin investment vehicle. Its financial performance should be evaluated relative to Bitcoin’s long-term value appreciation, which fundamentally alters traditional efficiency metrics.

   •   MicroStrategy’s 450,000 BTC holdings provide immense leverage in a scenario where Bitcoin’s price appreciates as predicted by Michael Saylor’s thesis (e.g., $13 million per Bitcoin in 21 years).

2. DCF and Future Cash Flows

   •   The individual does not account for the potential of MicroStrategy’s future cash flows from financing activities. Based on our DCF model, the company could generate significant shareholder value with $3 trillion in annual bond sales in 21 years, delivering a perpetuity of returns at 20%.

   •   A traditional efficiency chart fails to capture this long-term potential, as it focuses solely on backward-looking metrics.

3. Bitcoin Volatility vs. Long-Term Growth

   •   The analysis appears focused on short-term inefficiencies, such as the negative ROE and ROIC, without acknowledging the volatility and growth trajectory of Bitcoin.

   •   Historically, Bitcoin has delivered exponential returns over multi-year cycles. MicroStrategy’s strategy aligns with the Power Law model of Bitcoin’s price, offering asymmetric upside.

4. Strategic Positioning

   •   MicroStrategy’s aggressive accumulation of Bitcoin positions it as a leader in corporate adoption of digital assets. This positions the company uniquely among competitors, which the analysis fails to acknowledge.

   •   If Bitcoin becomes a widely adopted global monetary standard, MicroStrategy’s market valuation could rise exponentially.

5. Intangibles of Bitcoin Holdings

   •   The analysis does not account for the intangible benefits of holding Bitcoin:

      •   Increased attention and branding as a Bitcoin pioneer.

      •   Significant leverage in the financial ecosystem should Bitcoin gain broader adoption.

      •   A hedge against fiat inflation and macroeconomic instability.

6. Intrinsic Value of Software Business

   •   While the focus is on negative financial metrics, it overlooks the software business, which remains profitable on its own. Even without Bitcoin, the company’s enterprise analytics solutions provide a stable foundation.

7. Flawed Peer Comparisons

   •   Comparing MicroStrategy to traditional software companies (like Adobe or Autodesk) is misleading:

      •   These companies focus purely on software and SaaS metrics.

      •   MicroStrategy’s strategy combines software and treasury investment in Bitcoin, requiring a hybrid evaluation approach.

Key Takeaways

   •   The individual’s analysis focuses narrowly on short-term efficiency metrics, which fail to capture MicroStrategy’s long-term potential tied to Bitcoin adoption and DCF projections.

   •   MicroStrategy’s value is intrinsically tied to Bitcoin’s growth and the evolving global financial system.

   •   Evaluating the company solely through traditional financial metrics (ROE, ROIC, ROA) without accounting for its Bitcoin holdings, future cash flows, and asymmetric upside is an incomplete and short-sighted approach.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts